<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Too many OpenID registras considered harmful?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2007/03/09/too-many-openid-registras-considered-harmful/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2007/03/09/too-many-openid-registras-considered-harmful</link>
	<description>A permanent record for what's interesting today - this is my live journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:35:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: byte</title>
		<link>http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2007/03/09/too-many-openid-registras-considered-harmful/comment-page-1#comment-124714</link>
		<dc:creator>byte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2007/03/09/too-many-openid-registras-considered-harmful#comment-124714</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that bjorn. But I&#039;d rather not have to run yet another service...

I envisioned OpenID to be more like how DNS &quot;just works&quot;. I didn&#039;t want to see so many &quot;registras&quot;. I don&#039;t want my livejournal account, wordpress.com account and my open id account all being openids?

Now, I&#039;ve got more that one that I need. So I guess the solution is to run it on bytebot.net, and register/use that everywhere. But what about all the useless accounts that I&#039;ll also have in addition provided by wordpress.com, or lj, or something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that bjorn. But I&#8217;d rather not have to run yet another service&#8230;</p>
<p>I envisioned OpenID to be more like how DNS &#8220;just works&#8221;. I didn&#8217;t want to see so many &#8220;registras&#8221;. I don&#8217;t want my livejournal account, wordpress.com account and my open id account all being openids?</p>
<p>Now, I&#8217;ve got more that one that I need. So I guess the solution is to run it on bytebot.net, and register/use that everywhere. But what about all the useless accounts that I&#8217;ll also have in addition provided by wordpress.com, or lj, or something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bjorn</title>
		<link>http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2007/03/09/too-many-openid-registras-considered-harmful/comment-page-1#comment-124683</link>
		<dc:creator>Bjorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 01:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2007/03/09/too-many-openid-registras-considered-harmful#comment-124683</guid>
		<description>Are you aware that you can use bytebot as your openid and delegate to a registrar?  You can change openid registrar later without changing all your bytebot entries; just change the delegation.

Check http://intertwingly.net/blog/2007/01/03/OpenID-for-non-SuperUsers/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you aware that you can use bytebot as your openid and delegate to a registrar?  You can change openid registrar later without changing all your bytebot entries; just change the delegation.</p>
<p>Check <a href="http://intertwingly.net/blog/2007/01/03/OpenID-for-non-SuperUsers/" rel="nofollow">http://intertwingly.net/blog/2007/01/03/OpenID-for-non-SuperUsers/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
