<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Multi-arch on Debian/Ubuntu suck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2007/05/03/multi-arch-on-debianubuntu-suck/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2007/05/03/multi-arch-on-debianubuntu-suck</link>
	<description>A permanent record for what's interesting today - this is my live journal</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Irwan</title>
		<link>http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2007/05/03/multi-arch-on-debianubuntu-suck#comment-128197</link>
		<dc:creator>Irwan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 19:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2007/05/03/multi-arch-on-debianubuntu-suck#comment-128197</guid>
		<description>Why don't you just use the static binary with pre-compiled Qt version? It's so easy and painless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t you just use the static binary with pre-compiled Qt version? It&#8217;s so easy and painless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ubuntu on Embedded and Mobile devices ? : mypapit gnu/linux blog</title>
		<link>http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2007/05/03/multi-arch-on-debianubuntu-suck#comment-127589</link>
		<dc:creator>Ubuntu on Embedded and Mobile devices ? : mypapit gnu/linux blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 12:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2007/05/03/multi-arch-on-debianubuntu-suck#comment-127589</guid>
		<description>[...] its time to expand slowly and provide proper support for its current product, such as improving its 64-bit edition support and improving Xubuntu support for old and low-end machines. It is not to say that porting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] its time to expand slowly and provide proper support for its current product, such as improving its 64-bit edition support and improving Xubuntu support for old and low-end machines. It is not to say that porting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: byte</title>
		<link>http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2007/05/03/multi-arch-on-debianubuntu-suck#comment-127529</link>
		<dc:creator>byte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 08:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2007/05/03/multi-arch-on-debianubuntu-suck#comment-127529</guid>
		<description>Hey James. Yeah, I could install all the ia32 libraries, and then force-architecture, but figured that its probably not what I wanted to do. So I went the chroot way.

@l3v1: well, I guess once you get past the quirks, it all just works out for you. Its just that you get spoiled by Fedora and RPM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey James. Yeah, I could install all the ia32 libraries, and then force-architecture, but figured that its probably not what I wanted to do. So I went the chroot way.</p>
<p>@l3v1: well, I guess once you get past the quirks, it all just works out for you. Its just that you get spoiled by Fedora and RPM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: l3v1</title>
		<link>http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2007/05/03/multi-arch-on-debianubuntu-suck#comment-127477</link>
		<dc:creator>l3v1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 11:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2007/05/03/multi-arch-on-debianubuntu-suck#comment-127477</guid>
		<description>Me being a huge Debian fan for many years, I still suggest you try 64 bit gentoo for a change, I'm running ~amd64 on a mechine for more than a year now, and it handles itself well, emul-linux is your friend, but I have to tell the only 32bit necessities I ran into were flash related.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me being a huge Debian fan for many years, I still suggest you try 64 bit gentoo for a change, I&#8217;m running ~amd64 on a mechine for more than a year now, and it handles itself well, emul-linux is your friend, but I have to tell the only 32bit necessities I ran into were flash related.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2007/05/03/multi-arch-on-debianubuntu-suck#comment-127472</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 03:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2007/05/03/multi-arch-on-debianubuntu-suck#comment-127472</guid>
		<description>apt-get install ia32-libs is a good start, there's quite a few other 32bit libs in the amd64 archive. A chroot (with /home, /dev etc. bind mounted into it) is your next option. Finally, you can often be dirty and dpkg --install --force-architecture i386 packages on amd64.

True multi-arch is planned for dpkg, but I don't know of a timeline for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>apt-get install ia32-libs is a good start, there&#8217;s quite a few other 32bit libs in the amd64 archive. A chroot (with /home, /dev etc. bind mounted into it) is your next option. Finally, you can often be dirty and dpkg &#8211;install &#8211;force-architecture i386 packages on amd64.</p>
<p>True multi-arch is planned for dpkg, but I don&#8217;t know of a timeline for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
