<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Switching (to Ubuntu) dramas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2007/06/24/switching-to-ubuntu-dramas/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2007/06/24/switching-to-ubuntu-dramas</link>
	<description>A permanent record for what's interesting today - this is my live journal</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 01:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2007/06/24/switching-to-ubuntu-dramas#comment-128810</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 18:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2007/06/25/switching-to-ubuntu-dramas#comment-128810</guid>
		<description>MOTU vs. Package Maintainer - This 'policy' also sets Ubuntu apart from Debian.  Ubuntu's "chaos theory", works for the most part, in allowing developers to contribute more freely, yet one has to wonder what this does for quality assurance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MOTU vs. Package Maintainer - This &#8216;policy&#8217; also sets Ubuntu apart from Debian.  Ubuntu&#8217;s &#8220;chaos theory&#8221;, works for the most part, in allowing developers to contribute more freely, yet one has to wonder what this does for quality assurance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Ashley</title>
		<link>http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2007/06/24/switching-to-ubuntu-dramas#comment-128780</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 02:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2007/06/25/switching-to-ubuntu-dramas#comment-128780</guid>
		<description>Actually to the flash thing the best solution I've found is &lt;a href="https://help.ubuntu.com/community/FirefoxAMD64Flash9?" rel="nofollow"&gt;FirefoxAMD64Flash9&lt;/a&gt; in the Ubuntu community wiki. Runs flash with a wrapper and the x86 support libraries while using the standard 64bit firefox installed in ubuntu.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually to the flash thing the best solution I&#8217;ve found is <a href="https://help.ubuntu.com/community/FirefoxAMD64Flash9?" rel="nofollow">FirefoxAMD64Flash9</a> in the Ubuntu community wiki. Runs flash with a wrapper and the x86 support libraries while using the standard 64bit firefox installed in ubuntu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexey Zakhlestin</title>
		<link>http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2007/06/24/switching-to-ubuntu-dramas#comment-128776</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexey Zakhlestin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 11:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2007/06/25/switching-to-ubuntu-dramas#comment-128776</guid>
		<description>It actually makes me wonder, why linux doesn't implement some kind of "universal" format similiar to apple's… that would allow users to have 32-bit/64-bit libraries packed in one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It actually makes me wonder, why linux doesn&#8217;t implement some kind of &#8220;universal&#8221; format similiar to apple&#8217;s… that would allow users to have 32-bit/64-bit libraries packed in one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
