<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fedora more successful, developer-wise, than Ubuntu</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2007/12/18/fedora-more-successful-developer-wise-than-ubuntu/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2007/12/18/fedora-more-successful-developer-wise-than-ubuntu</link>
	<description>A permanent record for what's interesting today - this is my live journal</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 23:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2007/12/18/fedora-more-successful-developer-wise-than-ubuntu#comment-130672</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 13:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2007/12/18/fedora-more-successful-developer-wise-than-ubuntu#comment-130672</guid>
		<description>Ubuntu also includes all the work done by Debian, so you can't compare it directly with Fedora.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ubuntu also includes all the work done by Debian, so you can&#8217;t compare it directly with Fedora.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
