<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LDAP vs. DBMS (or migrating to fedora directory server)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2008/02/18/ldap-vs-dbms-or-migrating-to-fedora-directory-server/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2008/02/18/ldap-vs-dbms-or-migrating-to-fedora-directory-server</link>
	<description>A permanent record for what's interesting today - this is my live journal</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2008/02/18/ldap-vs-dbms-or-migrating-to-fedora-directory-server#comment-131820</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2008/02/18/ldap-vs-dbms-or-migrating-to-fedora-directory-server#comment-131820</guid>
		<description>@James: Yeah, totally agree.

Shame they won't even use their own software:

http://blog.suretecsystems.com/archives/87-Fedora-Directory-Server-not-good-enough-for-Red-Hat.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@James: Yeah, totally agree.</p>
<p>Shame they won&#8217;t even use their own software:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.suretecsystems.com/archives/87-Fedora-Directory-Server-not-good-enough-for-Red-Hat.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.suretecsystems.com/archives/87-Fedora-Directory-Server-not-good-enough-for-Red-Hat.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2008/02/18/ldap-vs-dbms-or-migrating-to-fedora-directory-server#comment-131809</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2008/02/18/ldap-vs-dbms-or-migrating-to-fedora-directory-server#comment-131809</guid>
		<description>It's a pity it's got some inaccuracies about OpenLDAP. Let's see - it does multimaster in 2.4, has done schema replication since 2.3 (as part of in-directory config replication - FDS doesn't do that). And there's no mention of &lt;a href="http://www.connexitor.com/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=130" rel="nofollow"&gt;benchmarks&lt;/a&gt;. Admittedly I'm in the camp that can't understand why RH bought NDS instead of contributing to OpenLDAP - sure, I've got nostalgia for the Netscape server products, but that doesn't make them good code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a pity it&#8217;s got some inaccuracies about OpenLDAP. Let&#8217;s see - it does multimaster in 2.4, has done schema replication since 2.3 (as part of in-directory config replication - FDS doesn&#8217;t do that). And there&#8217;s no mention of <a href="http://www.connexitor.com/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=130" rel="nofollow">benchmarks</a>. Admittedly I&#8217;m in the camp that can&#8217;t understand why RH bought NDS instead of contributing to OpenLDAP - sure, I&#8217;ve got nostalgia for the Netscape server products, but that doesn&#8217;t make them good code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
