<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time Machine best backup option on Leopard?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2008/03/22/time-machine-best-backup-option-on-leopard/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2008/03/22/time-machine-best-backup-option-on-leopard</link>
	<description>A permanent record for what's interesting today - this is my live journal</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Time Machine best backup option on Leopa &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2008/03/22/time-machine-best-backup-option-on-leopard#comment-132328</link>
		<dc:creator>Time Machine best backup option on Leopa &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 09:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2008/03/22/time-machine-best-backup-option-on-leopard#comment-132328</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2008/03/22/time-machine-best-backup-option-on-leopard asks Hoosgot, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2008/03/22/time-machine-best-backup-option-on-leopard" rel="nofollow">http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2008/03/22/time-machine-best-backup-option-on-leopard</a> asks Hoosgot, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cafuego</title>
		<link>http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2008/03/22/time-machine-best-backup-option-on-leopard#comment-132327</link>
		<dc:creator>Cafuego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 09:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2008/03/22/time-machine-best-backup-option-on-leopard#comment-132327</guid>
		<description>Time machine will tell you when the disk is full and you can then discard entire snapshots to make space available again, more or less similar to the --remove-older-than option to rdiff-backup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time machine will tell you when the disk is full and you can then discard entire snapshots to make space available again, more or less similar to the &#8211;remove-older-than option to rdiff-backup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: byte</title>
		<link>http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2008/03/22/time-machine-best-backup-option-on-leopard#comment-132326</link>
		<dc:creator>byte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 09:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2008/03/22/time-machine-best-backup-option-on-leopard#comment-132326</guid>
		<description>Thanks Peter! I'll just use Time Machine and hopefully, never have to worry about running out of space on the 320gb disk...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Peter! I&#8217;ll just use Time Machine and hopefully, never have to worry about running out of space on the 320gb disk&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cafuego</title>
		<link>http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2008/03/22/time-machine-best-backup-option-on-leopard#comment-132325</link>
		<dc:creator>Cafuego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 09:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bytebot.net/blog/archives/2008/03/22/time-machine-best-backup-option-on-leopard#comment-132325</guid>
		<description>Time machine does take a bit more space on your backup disk, as it will backup your WHOLE system, not just the dirs you'd point rdiff-backup at, but I think the conveniece of restoring to a working system would outweigh the space issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time machine does take a bit more space on your backup disk, as it will backup your WHOLE system, not just the dirs you&#8217;d point rdiff-backup at, but I think the conveniece of restoring to a working system would outweigh the space issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
