{"id":2320,"date":"2012-03-05T10:17:59","date_gmt":"2012-03-05T15:17:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/?p=2320"},"modified":"2012-03-05T10:18:02","modified_gmt":"2012-03-05T15:18:02","slug":"keeping-up-with-the-conversation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/archives\/2012\/03\/05\/keeping-up-with-the-conversation","title":{"rendered":"Keeping up with the conversation"},"content":{"rendered":"

Today I read a re-tweeted tweet<\/a> by a fellow Malaysian who said:<\/p>\n

\n

@etp_roadmap @IdrisJala_ c what I meant u all cant change. U only RT tweets that favors U all but never on negative tweets..learn 2b fair<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

This is probably true. You can retweet whatever you want. Naturally, you’ll only retweet things that you find are positive to you (or align with your points of view). This is the thesis behind things like Tumblr and other reblogging platforms.<\/p>\n

This is the beauty of Twitter as a conversation medium. You can actually just search for a string. And with the @reply mechanism, you just end up searching for “etp_roadmap<\/a>” and you see heaps of amazing commentary.<\/p>\n

Granted, this is not something everyone would do. But with social media you get the choice<\/strong>. With traditional media, you’re forced to look at one point of view. Letters that get published don’t necessarily have to be “independent”. Social allows those that are interested to dig deeper. This is true power.<\/p>\n

Do the cybertroopers know this? Its easy to figure things out, if you’re looking.<\/p>\n

Share this:<\/h3>