{"id":283,"date":"2005-02-27T21:25:34","date_gmt":"2005-02-28T02:25:34","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=283"},"modified":"2005-02-28T21:25:49","modified_gmt":"2005-03-01T02:25:49","slug":"fedora-creates-the-dna-that-allows-us-to-create-a-new-product","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/archives\/2005\/02\/27\/fedora-creates-the-dna-that-allows-us-to-create-a-new-product","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;Fedora creates the DNA that allows us to create a new product&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/news.com.com\/Red+Hat:+Fedora+will+engage+customers\/2100-7344_3-5582945.html\">Fedora will engage customers<\/a> is what hit the news sites, during FUDCon. And with Extras, and what happened, we seemed relatively successful with the meeting and then the launch of the committee. Then we also did the fedora-maintainers list, which seems to not have gone down so well, in-spite of the -readonly copy of it. Acceptance of it has been spotty at best, reading fedora-devel-list.<\/p>\n<p>But it is a necessary evil. Power isn&#8217;t reserved for an elite group, and Seth points out quite nicely <a href=\"https:\/\/www.redhat.com\/archives\/fedora-devel-list\/2005-February\/msg01540.html\">other private<\/a> partys. But where do we draw the line is the question. I was part of the unanimous decision to create the semi-private party at fedora-maintainers, because there was no way all the @redhat&#8217;s were to sit at f-d-l, and there was quite the bit of noise. Its a fair requirement that if you maintain a package you get placed on another list. <i>You are now a valuable contributor, as opposed to being a regular noise maker, no?<\/i><\/p>\n<p>Take the recent &#8220;let&#8217;s slim Fedora Core 4 down&#8221; discussion. I&#8217;m even afraid to count how many messages there were for that. The point of -maintainers is that we figure people won&#8217;t bring up the &#8220;lets move GNOME\/KDE to Extras&#8221; kind of discussion. The same discussion gets old. Read the list archives. But the core problem with open source is that <i>everyone feels they need to have an opinion<\/i>. And everyone feels that their opinion is right. And is the be all, and the end all.<\/p>\n<p>So FC-4 is going to have 5 CDs. Abiword, Exim, bzflag and a whole bunch of other useful packages are disappearing from Core. But they&#8217;re not gone anywhere. They&#8217;ll be in Extras. Extras will even be enabled, by default, in \/etc\/yum.repos.d\/, so if you&#8217;re missing bzflag, a simple &#8220;yum install bzflag&#8221; will get you happy again. <i>&#8220;Core is what Red Hat maintains. Extras is what the community maintains,&#8221;<\/i> aoliva says. And yes, Red Hat is <i>part of<\/i> the community.<\/p>\n<p>Back to communication. We&#8217;re still not definitely good at it. But if there are wanting contributors, the <a href=\"http:\/\/fedoraproject.org\/wiki\/Extras\/IdeasSandbox\">Extras\/IdeasSandbox<\/a> is a good place to start. We have a <a href=\"http:\/\/fedoraproject.org\/wiki\/FedoraExtrasSchedule\">public schedule<\/a> for the &#8220;shit that needs to get done&#8221;. And the Fedora News Updates will come back, as Fedora Traffic; so if you were a wanting contributor, now&#8217;s a good time to send me some e-mail.<\/p>\n<div class=\"sharedaddy sd-sharing-enabled\"><div class=\"robots-nocontent sd-block sd-social sd-social-icon-text sd-sharing\"><h3 class=\"sd-title\">Share this:<\/h3><div class=\"sd-content\"><ul><li class=\"share-email\"><a rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-shared=\"\" class=\"share-email sd-button share-icon\" href=\"mailto:?subject=%5BShared%20Post%5D%20%22Fedora%20creates%20the%20DNA%20that%20allows%20us%20to%20create%20a%20new%20product%22&body=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bytebot.net%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2005%2F02%2F27%2Ffedora-creates-the-dna-that-allows-us-to-create-a-new-product&share=email\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Click to email a link to a friend\" data-email-share-error-title=\"Do you have email set up?\" data-email-share-error-text=\"If you&#039;re having problems sharing via email, you might not have email set up for your browser. You may need to create a new email yourself.\" data-email-share-nonce=\"836214d130\" data-email-share-track-url=\"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/archives\/2005\/02\/27\/fedora-creates-the-dna-that-allows-us-to-create-a-new-product?share=email\"><span>Email<\/span><\/a><\/li><li class=\"share-facebook\"><a rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-shared=\"sharing-facebook-283\" class=\"share-facebook sd-button share-icon\" href=\"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/archives\/2005\/02\/27\/fedora-creates-the-dna-that-allows-us-to-create-a-new-product?share=facebook\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Click to share on Facebook\" ><span>Facebook<\/span><\/a><\/li><li class=\"share-linkedin\"><a rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-shared=\"sharing-linkedin-283\" class=\"share-linkedin sd-button share-icon\" href=\"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/archives\/2005\/02\/27\/fedora-creates-the-dna-that-allows-us-to-create-a-new-product?share=linkedin\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Click to share on LinkedIn\" ><span>LinkedIn<\/span><\/a><\/li><li class=\"share-twitter\"><a rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-shared=\"sharing-twitter-283\" class=\"share-twitter sd-button share-icon\" href=\"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/archives\/2005\/02\/27\/fedora-creates-the-dna-that-allows-us-to-create-a-new-product?share=twitter\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Click to share on Twitter\" ><span>Twitter<\/span><\/a><\/li><li class=\"share-end\"><\/li><\/ul><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Fedora will engage customers is what hit the news sites, during FUDCon. And with Extras, and what happened, we seemed relatively successful with the meeting and then the launch of the committee. Then we also did the fedora-maintainers list, which seems to not have gone down so well, in-spite of the -readonly copy of it. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n<div class=\"sharedaddy sd-sharing-enabled\"><div class=\"robots-nocontent sd-block sd-social sd-social-icon-text sd-sharing\"><h3 class=\"sd-title\">Share this:<\/h3><div class=\"sd-content\"><ul><li class=\"share-email\"><a rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-shared=\"\" class=\"share-email sd-button share-icon\" href=\"mailto:?subject=%5BShared%20Post%5D%20%22Fedora%20creates%20the%20DNA%20that%20allows%20us%20to%20create%20a%20new%20product%22&body=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bytebot.net%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2005%2F02%2F27%2Ffedora-creates-the-dna-that-allows-us-to-create-a-new-product&share=email\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Click to email a link to a friend\" data-email-share-error-title=\"Do you have email set up?\" data-email-share-error-text=\"If you&#039;re having problems sharing via email, you might not have email set up for your browser. You may need to create a new email yourself.\" data-email-share-nonce=\"836214d130\" data-email-share-track-url=\"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/archives\/2005\/02\/27\/fedora-creates-the-dna-that-allows-us-to-create-a-new-product?share=email\"><span>Email<\/span><\/a><\/li><li class=\"share-facebook\"><a rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-shared=\"sharing-facebook-283\" class=\"share-facebook sd-button share-icon\" href=\"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/archives\/2005\/02\/27\/fedora-creates-the-dna-that-allows-us-to-create-a-new-product?share=facebook\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Click to share on Facebook\" ><span>Facebook<\/span><\/a><\/li><li class=\"share-linkedin\"><a rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-shared=\"sharing-linkedin-283\" class=\"share-linkedin sd-button share-icon\" href=\"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/archives\/2005\/02\/27\/fedora-creates-the-dna-that-allows-us-to-create-a-new-product?share=linkedin\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Click to share on LinkedIn\" ><span>LinkedIn<\/span><\/a><\/li><li class=\"share-twitter\"><a rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-shared=\"sharing-twitter-283\" class=\"share-twitter sd-button share-icon\" href=\"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/archives\/2005\/02\/27\/fedora-creates-the-dna-that-allows-us-to-create-a-new-product?share=twitter\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Click to share on Twitter\" ><span>Twitter<\/span><\/a><\/li><li class=\"share-end\"><\/li><\/ul><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_options":[]},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4vJD-4z","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":685,"url":"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/archives\/2007\/12\/18\/fedora-more-successful-developer-wise-than-ubuntu","url_meta":{"origin":283,"position":0},"title":"Fedora more successful, developer-wise, than Ubuntu","date":"18\/12\/2007","format":false,"excerpt":"Statistics are interesting. Every Fedora Project Contributor gets an @fedoraproject.org alias. So I'm presuming, this number is greater than just package maintainers...Fedora, via Max Spevack:non-RH maintainers: 276RH maintainers: 202total @fedoraproject.org aliases for package maintainers: 478Ubuntu, via Daniel Robitaille:348total @ubuntu.com aliases: 348By the above, does it mean Fedora is way more\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;General&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":291,"url":"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/archives\/2005\/03\/24\/its-a-good-friday","url_meta":{"origin":283,"position":1},"title":"Its a Good Friday!","date":"24\/3\/2005","format":false,"excerpt":"So it was nice to see Coastguard from Cybersource. Using IceWM, Knoppix, and Firefox for all its functionality, which involves Internet banking. FWIW, I bank with several banks (ING, ANZ, Commonwealth), and they all seem to work well on my Linux box running Firefox. Granted I have the Java plugin,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;General&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":92,"url":"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/archives\/2004\/04\/05\/fedora-jobs-list-and-test-notes","url_meta":{"origin":283,"position":2},"title":"Fedora Jobs list and test notes","date":"5\/4\/2004","format":false,"excerpt":"I've been keeping some Fedora Core 2 test notes, and thought that I'd make it public since the traffic on fedora-test-list is becoming pretty insane (with similar messages!). I present to you, Fedora Core 2 testX notes, where X is still {1,2}. So new testers, read this, it has lots\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;General&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":155,"url":"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/archives\/2004\/06\/11\/fnu-13-fedora-docs","url_meta":{"origin":283,"position":3},"title":"FNU #13, Fedora docs","date":"11\/6\/2004","format":false,"excerpt":"Fedora News Updates #13 is out. By far, the largest ever (not that this is the first time its a three-week summary). 18901 bytes. It's getting mighty hard to write it with so many posts - start contributing folk, especially trawl fedora-list... Fragmenting the Fedora documentation isn't a good idea\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;General&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":73,"url":"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/archives\/2004\/03\/18\/fedora-news-updates-8","url_meta":{"origin":283,"position":4},"title":"Fedora News Updates #8","date":"18\/3\/2004","format":false,"excerpt":"FNU #8 is out. In this issue, I cover the official release of Fedora Core 1 for AMD64 platforms, a new SELinux mailing list, many beginners tips, getting Fedora installed via a Promise SATA controller, and more. Congrats to aoliva with his new baby. OK, I'm off, India here I\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;General&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":224,"url":"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/archives\/2004\/10\/10\/observations","url_meta":{"origin":283,"position":5},"title":"Observations","date":"10\/10\/2004","format":false,"excerpt":"I've been on the nahant-beta-list for a while now and don't notice a heap of posts there, like the users you'd get on Fedora lists, or the testers on fedora-test-list. Either RHEL4-beta \"just works\", or many aren't testing it as rigorously as they are Fedora. I wonder what Red Hat's\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;General&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/283"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=283"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/283\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=283"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=283"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=283"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}