{"id":691,"date":"2008-01-08T01:31:48","date_gmt":"2008-01-08T06:31:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/archives\/2008\/01\/08\/zimbra-claims-zcs-50-issues-are-the-fault-of-centos"},"modified":"2008-01-11T03:36:43","modified_gmt":"2008-01-11T08:36:43","slug":"zimbra-claims-zcs-50-issues-are-the-fault-of-centos","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/archives\/2008\/01\/08\/zimbra-claims-zcs-50-issues-are-the-fault-of-centos","title":{"rendered":"Zimbra claims ZCS 5.0 issues are the fault of CentOS"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>If CentOS (and by the same vein, Oracle Enterprise Linux) claims compatibility with RHEL, why is Zimbra saying that the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.zimbra.com\/forums\/announcements\/14116-centos-not-supported.html\">issue<\/a> with ZCS 5.0, Scalar::Util, and Perl, is caused by CentOS?<\/p>\n<p>QA&#8217;ing against RHEL, and not CentOS is expected, but saying there&#8217;s no compatibility between CentOS and RHEL, sounds like a bit of a fib, don&#8217;t you think?<\/p>\n<p>Even better, the recommendation to use Ubuntu. Will there be a LTS release, at some stage soon? It looks like Canonical are behind schedule for another LTS release&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Technorati Tags: <a href=\"http:\/\/technorati.com\/tag\/zimbra\" class=\"performancingtags\" rel=\"tag\">zimbra<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/technorati.com\/tag\/zimbra%20collaboration%20suite\" class=\"performancingtags\" rel=\"tag\">zimbra collaboration suite<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/technorati.com\/tag\/zcs\" class=\"performancingtags\" rel=\"tag\">zcs<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/technorati.com\/tag\/zcs5\" class=\"performancingtags\" rel=\"tag\">zcs5<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/technorati.com\/tag\/qa\" class=\"performancingtags\" rel=\"tag\">qa<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/technorati.com\/tag\/scalar:util\" class=\"performancingtags\" rel=\"tag\">scalar:util<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/technorati.com\/tag\/centos\" class=\"performancingtags\" rel=\"tag\">centos<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/technorati.com\/tag\/perl\" class=\"performancingtags\" rel=\"tag\">perl<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/technorati.com\/tag\/compatibility\" class=\"performancingtags\" rel=\"tag\">compatibility<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/technorati.com\/tag\/rhel\" class=\"performancingtags\" rel=\"tag\">rhel<\/a><\/p>\n<div class=\"sharedaddy sd-sharing-enabled\"><div class=\"robots-nocontent sd-block sd-social sd-social-icon-text sd-sharing\"><h3 class=\"sd-title\">Share this:<\/h3><div class=\"sd-content\"><ul><li class=\"share-email\"><a rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-shared=\"\" class=\"share-email sd-button share-icon\" href=\"mailto:?subject=%5BShared%20Post%5D%20Zimbra%20claims%20ZCS%205.0%20issues%20are%20the%20fault%20of%20CentOS&body=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bytebot.net%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2008%2F01%2F08%2Fzimbra-claims-zcs-50-issues-are-the-fault-of-centos&share=email\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Click to email a link to a friend\" data-email-share-error-title=\"Do you have email set up?\" data-email-share-error-text=\"If you&#039;re having problems sharing via email, you might not have email set up for your browser. You may need to create a new email yourself.\" data-email-share-nonce=\"62b2684ed1\" data-email-share-track-url=\"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/archives\/2008\/01\/08\/zimbra-claims-zcs-50-issues-are-the-fault-of-centos?share=email\"><span>Email<\/span><\/a><\/li><li class=\"share-facebook\"><a rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-shared=\"sharing-facebook-691\" class=\"share-facebook sd-button share-icon\" href=\"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/archives\/2008\/01\/08\/zimbra-claims-zcs-50-issues-are-the-fault-of-centos?share=facebook\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Click to share on Facebook\" ><span>Facebook<\/span><\/a><\/li><li class=\"share-linkedin\"><a rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-shared=\"sharing-linkedin-691\" class=\"share-linkedin sd-button share-icon\" href=\"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/archives\/2008\/01\/08\/zimbra-claims-zcs-50-issues-are-the-fault-of-centos?share=linkedin\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Click to share on LinkedIn\" ><span>LinkedIn<\/span><\/a><\/li><li class=\"share-twitter\"><a rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-shared=\"sharing-twitter-691\" class=\"share-twitter sd-button share-icon\" href=\"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/archives\/2008\/01\/08\/zimbra-claims-zcs-50-issues-are-the-fault-of-centos?share=twitter\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Click to share on Twitter\" ><span>Twitter<\/span><\/a><\/li><li class=\"share-end\"><\/li><\/ul><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>If CentOS (and by the same vein, Oracle Enterprise Linux) claims compatibility with RHEL, why is Zimbra saying that the issue with ZCS 5.0, Scalar::Util, and Perl, is caused by CentOS? QA&#8217;ing against RHEL, and not CentOS is expected, but saying there&#8217;s no compatibility between CentOS and RHEL, sounds like a bit of a fib, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n<div class=\"sharedaddy sd-sharing-enabled\"><div class=\"robots-nocontent sd-block sd-social sd-social-icon-text sd-sharing\"><h3 class=\"sd-title\">Share this:<\/h3><div class=\"sd-content\"><ul><li class=\"share-email\"><a rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-shared=\"\" class=\"share-email sd-button share-icon\" href=\"mailto:?subject=%5BShared%20Post%5D%20Zimbra%20claims%20ZCS%205.0%20issues%20are%20the%20fault%20of%20CentOS&body=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bytebot.net%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2008%2F01%2F08%2Fzimbra-claims-zcs-50-issues-are-the-fault-of-centos&share=email\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Click to email a link to a friend\" data-email-share-error-title=\"Do you have email set up?\" data-email-share-error-text=\"If you&#039;re having problems sharing via email, you might not have email set up for your browser. You may need to create a new email yourself.\" data-email-share-nonce=\"62b2684ed1\" data-email-share-track-url=\"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/archives\/2008\/01\/08\/zimbra-claims-zcs-50-issues-are-the-fault-of-centos?share=email\"><span>Email<\/span><\/a><\/li><li class=\"share-facebook\"><a rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-shared=\"sharing-facebook-691\" class=\"share-facebook sd-button share-icon\" href=\"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/archives\/2008\/01\/08\/zimbra-claims-zcs-50-issues-are-the-fault-of-centos?share=facebook\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Click to share on Facebook\" ><span>Facebook<\/span><\/a><\/li><li class=\"share-linkedin\"><a rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-shared=\"sharing-linkedin-691\" class=\"share-linkedin sd-button share-icon\" href=\"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/archives\/2008\/01\/08\/zimbra-claims-zcs-50-issues-are-the-fault-of-centos?share=linkedin\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Click to share on LinkedIn\" ><span>LinkedIn<\/span><\/a><\/li><li class=\"share-twitter\"><a rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-shared=\"sharing-twitter-691\" class=\"share-twitter sd-button share-icon\" href=\"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/archives\/2008\/01\/08\/zimbra-claims-zcs-50-issues-are-the-fault-of-centos?share=twitter\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Click to share on Twitter\" ><span>Twitter<\/span><\/a><\/li><li class=\"share-end\"><\/li><\/ul><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_options":[]},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4vJD-b9","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":688,"url":"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/archives\/2008\/01\/04\/zimbra-zcs-50-ga-is-it-really-a-ga-release","url_meta":{"origin":691,"position":0},"title":"Zimbra ZCS 5.0 GA &#8211; is it really a GA release?","date":"4\/1\/2008","format":false,"excerpt":"I took the opportunity today evening to get myself upgraded (from 4.5.3_GA_733) to the latest (5.0.0_GA_1869) open source version of Zimbra - ZCS 5.0 GA. The database migration took about the longest, mainly due to some schema changes. Lots of starts and stops to the database. Its now running MySQL\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;General&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":698,"url":"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/archives\/2008\/01\/16\/server-downtime","url_meta":{"origin":691,"position":1},"title":"Server downtime","date":"16\/1\/2008","format":false,"excerpt":"Khairil talks about server downtime, and I can attest to that (hogwarts is just above gambit). The Dell arrived on Friday, popped Centos 5.1 on it, realised that if you ticked \"Virtualization\", you ended up not getting a regular kernel (no big deal, eh?). Configured it as best as could\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;General&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":496,"url":"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/archives\/2007\/03\/27\/zimbra-its-just-so-enterprise-like","url_meta":{"origin":691,"position":2},"title":"Zimbra: Its just so enterprise-like!","date":"27\/3\/2007","format":false,"excerpt":"Zimbra is truly the answer to the open source mail+calendering+contact management application. I have been playing around, and more recently using in production, the Zimbra Collaboration Suite, and all I can say is that it's darn impressive. While evaluating, I was always worried about the upgrade process - it seemed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;General&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":601,"url":"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/archives\/2007\/08\/03\/zimbra-and-nokia-symbian-series-60-imaps-issue","url_meta":{"origin":691,"position":3},"title":"Zimbra, and Nokia Symbian Series 60 IMAPS issue","date":"3\/8\/2007","format":false,"excerpt":"I've been a big supporter of Zimbra, because I think they're one of the few projects\/companies that get email\/calendering\/a groupware solution, right. Sure, I don't necessarily like the model where they cripple the open source version in terms of say, backups (but this I guess will be fixed when MySQL\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;General&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1593,"url":"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/archives\/2009\/10\/12\/mysql-in-rhel5centos5-gets-an-update","url_meta":{"origin":691,"position":4},"title":"MySQL in RHEL5\/CentOS5 gets an update","date":"12\/10\/2009","format":false,"excerpt":"It's worth noting that Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 5 has had an update to MySQL in the last month. This naturally means that CentOS 5 also had a similar update. It's now bumped up to MySQL 5.0.77 (goodbye 5.0.45!; which is what RHEL5 shipped with). This is a moderate\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;MySQL&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2167,"url":"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/archives\/2011\/07\/24\/updating-php-in-rhelcentos-5-6-for-wordpress-3-2","url_meta":{"origin":691,"position":5},"title":"Updating PHP in RHEL\/CentOS 5.6 for WordPress 3.2","date":"24\/7\/2011","format":false,"excerpt":"Try doing yum install php53 on a RHEL 5.6\/CentOS 5.6 system, and see the following: --> Finished Dependency Resolution php53-common-5.3.3-1.el5_6.1.x86_64 from updates has depsolving problems --> php53-common conflicts with php-common Error: php53-common conflicts with php-common You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: package-cleanup\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;General&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/691"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=691"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/691\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=691"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=691"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.bytebot.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=691"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}